Users primarily aiming for a workstation build would appreciate the added performance and faster render times provided by Team Red even if it means it costs much more. The Zen 3 based Ryzen 5 5600X is clearly much faster than Intel’s Rocket Lake budget counterpart. Unlike the gaming benchmark, the productivity results for the two CPUs give a very binary result. The two processors are again quite close in the Adobe Photoshop 2020 test, with the Core i5 having a score of 1017 and the Ryzen 5 having a score of 1076.įinally, the Blender Open Data render times for both CPUs show that the Ryzen 5 5600X reached completion in 1122 seconds while the 11400F took longer at 1233 seconds. The Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 benchmark results award the 11400F and 5600X with scores of 677 and 746 respectively. The DaVinci Resolve 4K benchmarks scores show that Team Blue and Team Red are quite close, with the former having a score of 969, though the latter outdoes it with a score of 1017. Meanwhile the 11400F managed to complete the Chromium Code Compile test in 7995 seconds, while the faster Zen 3 5600X completed it in 7047 seconds. In the SiSoft Sandra Cryptography Multi Threaded performance test, the Core i5 11400F achieved a speed of 18.2 GB/s, and as usual the Ryzen 5 5600X was faster at 19.2 GB/s. In the Decompression test, the 11400F scored 64461 while the 5600X was ahead by a good margin with 86940. The Ryzen 5 5600X again trumps Intel with a score of 72344. The 7-Zip File Manager Compression test shows the Core i5 11400F achieve a score of 59002. Moving onto the Single Core workloads in Cinebench R20, Team Blue manages to obtain a score of 541 with Team Red blasting past with a score of 600. Starting off with the Cinebench R20 Multi Core benchmark, the Core i5 11400F cores 3954, while the Ryzen 5 5600X scored 4462 an expected gain. Moving onto CPU intensive productivity workloads, we can see how the $157 MSRP Core i5 11400F fares against the much more expensive Ryzen 5 5600X. It goes without saying that for games, paying nearly double for an average 2% increase in framerate does not seem all that worth it. The largest variation in FPS is shown in Metro Exodus, with the Ryzen 5 gaining 12 frames per second over the Core i5.Īll-in-all, the eight game averages for Team Blue and Team Red are 134 and 137.25 respectively. But this difference is a tossup between either, so your mileage may vary. Cyberpunk 2077 sees a slightly higher framerate on the Core i5 11400F. The only exceptions being Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Red Dead Redemption 2 two very GPU intensive games that both have equal average framerates on both processors. The 1080p gaming benchmarks show the Ryzen 5 5600X being mostly ahead of the Core i5 11400F. *Benchmarks courtesy of Benchmark– YouTube In order to see just how much these two processors differ in terms of performance, let’s turn to the benchmarks. The base clock speed of the Ryzen 5 is much higher than that of the Core i5 11400F, while its boost clock is another 200MHz higher than that of Team Blue.īoth have the same advertised thermal design power however, this means little since in real use cases the power draw of both chips will be higher. However, it’s also clear why since Team Red’s cheapest Zen 3 offering costs nearly twice as much as the 11400F at its MSRP. At first glance, the specifications show that the Ryzen 5 5600X will vastly outperform the Core i5 11400F.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |